As the third time watching "Rear Window", I still seem to notice different things each time. The opening scene of Rear Window, where we first are exposed to a story of some sort, later is a big part of the plot of the main character Jeff. We learn from the opening scene that Jeff is a photographer that was injured badly due to a racetrack crash he desperately wanted to photograph. We also see, that I didn't notice the first times watching, a picture with a negative coloring effect that we learn is Jeff's "girlfriend" Lisa. That opening scene pretty much tells us the story behind the whole plot before even starting the film, including introducing another character. This is one thing that Hitchcock adds to the film Rear Window is the romance between Jeff and Lisa. I think the romance added something more for the audience to engage in rather than the simple plot of Jeff looking out his rear window.
We can assume that Jeff is very dedicated to his photography work as he did mention on the phone that he really didn't need to get that photograph of the racetrack, but still did it anyways. This attitude plays out in the rest of the film as he is determined to figure out this mystery of his neighbor, Lars. At times I felt like Jeff was being too dramatic about the whole situation but I think that's what Hitchcock wanted. I think he wanted us to go against Jeff at times so we can later be surprised in the long run.
One of the sequences that uses a unique camera movements is the scenes where we see the pan movement looking out at the all neighbors. Even though this movement is not that steady, I wonder if we are suppose to be looking at Jeff's point of view during those scenes or just a third party. Since we see a lot in Jeff's point of view, at times it feels like it carries on way too long in that angle. It is a good thing that the other characters like Lisa and Stella came into this film giving the film more to work with. Besides the obsession Jeff has with the mystery across at his neighbors, these other characters bring out more of Jeff than we see. Lisa brings out his romantic side. Lisa is also some way his opposite since they have different outlooks in the beginning of the film.
One thing that some people may not notice the first time watching this film is the progress of the neighbor's song. At first the neighbor's song is very sloppy as we see him aggravated throughout the whole film. But the way I saw it is that the progress of solving the Lars mystery, is the same as the progress of the song. After Lars gets arrested, we then see that the piano player finishes song and even shares it with one of the female neighbors whose life was saved by the song. I thought it was neat how Hitchcock played the whole piano player's song into this film making it a part of the story as well as a part of the background music.
I too think that the movie would have suffered without a love interest. The stationary nature of the plot would have been hard to keep interesting without some peripheral activity. I suppose, in the absence of a romance, Stella could have been given a larger role, as she was an entertaining character who added context as well as comic relief. But Lisa was able to add dimension and back-story as well as insight to Jeff's character that Stella probably couldn't have, and, Lisa was gorgeous; that never hurts.
ReplyDeleteThe piano player is probably my favorite part of this movie. His story is so separate from the main action while the progression of his music mirrors the progression of the plot to a degree. In this way, Hitchcock is playing with what we know to be diagetic and nondiagetic sound in the movie. This means, at lease for me, that every time we hear music in the movie it is important and noticeable, unlike many traditional movie soundtracks where the music compliments the action rather than spurring action.
ReplyDeleteI agree about the piano player. He seemed to blur the lines between diagetic and nondiagetic music, and I thought that this created a lot of interest for me. In addition, I felt that the other windows, in general, created a more dimensional story. I can't help but think of the GC buzzword "community" when I think about the scene showing all of the different individuals, couples, and groups.
ReplyDeleteto be honest, I wasn't paying that close of attention to the piano player, so I'm really glad you pointed out how his progress reflected that of Jeff, as he worked to solve the mystery. It definitely adds a unique dimension to the story, and going off of Maggie's comment, really adds to the "community" feel of those courtyard scenes. Hitchcock does a great job of creating an environment that feels real and representative of urban living.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you about Hitchcock wanting us to occasionally go against Jeff. It makes him feel more human, as well. Yes, i love the progression of the piano player's song; that we get to see that and how it affects the people in the story. Lisa even mentions it at the beginning about out it's like it was written for them (her and Jeff) and as the song gets better, their relationship gets better.
ReplyDeleteI like when you said you see different things every time you watch the movie. I am that way with: The Godfather, Halloween, and Gone with the Wind. I think that is the point of the movie, humans will always see different things the more we watch. I don't think the movie would be as good without Lisa or Stella. Lisa and Stella adds some danger to the movie. I don't think Hitchcock would have put a handicapped person in danger or killed them off, could you imagine the hate mail. Plus, I like the fact that it was a woman who got the best of Thorwald. The killer in Silence of the Lambs murdered women and it was a heroine that defeated the man/killer in the end.
ReplyDeleteI agree a lot with Maggie about the concept of seeing the windows as a type of community because it showed a lot of diversity but a smaller space and the way it was set up. The way the camera views are at the beginning of the movie it almost seems like Jeff is looking out adoringly at this kind of community he's apart of when in reality it's a more voyeuristic act on his part.
ReplyDelete