Before watching the film "Adaptation", I could
assume that the film was going to be about adapting a novel into a screenplay.
Not only is our class based on film adaptations but also hence the title of the
film gives off the impression. A lot of material is introduced early in
“Adaptation” such as the plot, characters, and the conflicts that I think set the mood early for the film. The opening monologue scene immediately reveals the main character, Charlie Kaufman, speaking in first
person where we can observe that he thinks to himself in a nervous manner.
We can also quickly tell that Charlie goes through out this film beating
himself up with social issues, poor self esteem, and writers block as he
struggles to adapt the book “The Orchid Thief” into a screenplay. Not only does he struggle with all of this but he is also troubled by the
fact that his twin brother, who we don’t even know if he’s actually a real person or
not, who finds more success when writing screenplays. Now with all of this said, we
start to observe the whole process of what a screenwriter may go through to adapt
books into films. Even though this film was a little extreme at times, we could
observe that Charlie first began making a great effort to create a screenplay
that was true to the book. But as the film goes on, Charlie then later has to resort to changing his own material to fit the studio’s desires. This part of Charlie’s writing process
could possibly explain why some real life screenplay adaptations are not so true
to the book due to studio’s needs and desires. This change of writing method obviously
made Charlie’s job a lot easier due to the studio's opinion along with needing to meet deadlines. Towards the end the film
we get a better understanding on how to define the meaning of the word adaptation.
Even though adaptation is know as the process of adapting something, I think "Adaptation" adapts the basic meaning. I came to a conclusion that everything and
everyone in this film ended up somewhat adapting their own selves. Towards the
end of the film, Charlie, Susan Orlean, and John Laroche all adapted majorly in some way. But as all the main characters began to adapt themselves, the overall screenplay that started the whole thing was adapted which is most important.
This is the first scene when I noticed that Charlie was adapting his ways of writing the screenplay. He never believed in attending brainstorm seminars before his twin brother (or his self conscious) convinced him too.
This is the first scene when I noticed that Charlie was adapting his ways of writing the screenplay. He never believed in attending brainstorm seminars before his twin brother (or his self conscious) convinced him too.
This is one of the scenes that really expressed Charlie's trouble with his self esteem. As fate threw Charlie into a perfect situation to pitch his elevator pitch to the woman he wanted to meet, Susan Orlean, he was too nervous to take advantage of the opportunity.
I think the character of Donald is interesting, and I like how you brought it up. Of course we know he isn't a real life person, but is he even in the movie? I think that he is, but the real Charlie Kaufman wrote him as his twin to show this battling self-consciousness. Where in the movie he's a real person that people see and interact, in reality he is just the second half of Kaufman who keeps trying to take over his mind. You see this in so many of their arguments about screenwriting and how Charlie should do certain things that Donald thinks are good. It's a very interesting and powerful way to write it, considering a lot of it is very personal to the real Kaufman. I like how you mentioned the film adapted the definition of adaptation itself, very intriguing.
ReplyDeleteI sometimes wonder if we adapt ourselves just to please others. When we do adapt for others sake, I am wondering if we loose the essence of who really are.Charlie Kauffman adapted his screenplay to add the stereotypical Hollywood cliches in order to sell his script so he could have peace of mind. Is Charlie a sell out or did he know there was no hope for his movie if he didn't?
ReplyDeleteI, too, wonder how we are to understand the role/character of Donald in this film. More and more, I think it is a representation of a voice in our heads that may constantly tell us that we aren't "good enough" or doing the right things. Of course, Donald is too self-confident to see the errors of his ways -- the exact opposite of Charlie, who only sees his errors and flaws. I suppose that in order to "adapt," each of us might have to "kill off" the side of our self-consciousness that is always making us feel inadequate. Charlie makes peace with himself and then can let that part of himself (Donald) go. Maybe that is too psychoanalytical a reading here, but it is important to consider who/what Donald actually is.
ReplyDelete